Do Women Really Have the Right to Choose? not if We Want to Survive, They Don?t
Womens Issues September 3rd, 2010Do Women Really Have the Aptly to Choose? not if We Want to Carry on, They Don?t
2003 – Excerpt from the writings of a black author:
Evaporation of the Caucasian Race – The Centralized Personnel of Management and Budget (OMB) Directive 15, designates racial and ethnic categories used in the US
Census and in additional innumerable broadcast and confidential research projects.
When the term 8 percenters is used in this article, it refers to the evaporation of the European (Scandinavian/Nordic) White Caucasian Race. You can do a
quick examination for physically. Go to the Populace Allusion Bureau Website for 2003 and add the facts collectively. If you take the facts agreed for Europe
and North America and divide them by the facts agreed for Africa, Asia, South America and Oceania you can calculate the percentages. At the bestow time
(2003) Whites amount to about 20 percent. By 2050 the percentage will drop to between 5 – 8%. Between 92-95% of the planet’s populace will be non-White.
Today, the subsequent countries show a honest populace decline: Italy, Spain, Germany, France, Belgium, Portugal, Greece, Croatia, Ukraine, Russia,
Slovakia, Romania, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Bulgaria with more on the way. Germans – like the Italians, Russian, Spanish and Greeks – are also an
endangered species. And what is the ordinary bond?
They are all ‘white’ nations.
If you are a woman, there is something I wish to call to your attention. The human reace cannot carry on without replacing those who die. The exact mean
number of replacements that are de rigueur for survival is 2.1 offspring per healthy adult female. There are no exceptions. Everywhere babies are the result of
copulation between male and female, each female must yield on mean, 2.1 offspring for survival. Since this is fact, when we say that a woman has the
aptly to choose whether or not to have family, we are also adage she has the aptly to establish the prospect of mankind.
Did we mean to say that?
When men and women were made, they were made as a matched set. Like a nut and bolt, collectively they served a function. The function – the only function –
was the propagation of the species. Were it not for that, one gender would have been sufficient.
FACT:
“By no means before in history has such a progressive, accomplished race as the Caucasians, been so keen to end itself.”
I am aware that many women today object to the plotting that there is a stuck-up power than themselves so let me take a moment to place this on a personal level.
If you are a family man or woman, and you do have family, are there not rules of actions for your family? Can your 14 year ancient stay out til 4:00 AM only
because he or she wants to? No? Why not?
The answer is evident. Your family like any assemble has rules; it has responsibilities and obligations to go by the side of with benefits. That’s de rigueur both for
prosperity and for survival. In that watch, your family is a microcosm of society.
So what if your 19 year-ancient son refused to do the one business that he had to do for the family’s survival? Whatever that might be. And what if there was no one
else who may maybe do it but him? Would you just sign it off and let him stay in your home, below your safeguard, even as he threatened your family’s
survival? What if he said maybe the kid next door will come over and discharge this essential gathering instead of him? Would you accept that?
My estimate is you wouldn’t. If your son positioned you and your family’s survival in jeopardy, and he wouldn’t exchange his conduct, eventually you would have to question
him to house. There would be modest choice.
In clannish days long gone, any member of a tribe who didn’t go air force for the excellent of that tribe, was evicted. Existence as part of a assemble has to be
a quid pro quo arrangement.
There are essential responsibilities and obligations that must be fulfilled by a assemble’s members if the assemble – in this case society – is to carry on. Having
the requisite number of babies is one of those essential responsibilities and obligations. It is essential, not voluntary. There is austerely no substitute for
babies. We need 2.1 babies per women or we pass away and it’s just that unadorned.
Women today have been educated that abortion is an sound ‘aptly’. To that, I would say: jabber. Abortions affect the cleverness of a society to carry on so
abortion is everybody’s affair.
In this coutry, abortions have only been officially authorized since 1973 – a cycle of about 35 being. It was illegal, and not a ‘aptly’ at all, for the at the initiation 200 being of
our country’s existence. So if it’s a ‘aptly’ today, it was a ‘ill-treat’ days gone by. My top here is that ‘rights’ come and go according to society’s wants.
They are not assigned by some higher power.
In this country, like all others, there are a hundred thousand laws that in some way restrict or even deny us certain of what we might reckon of as our
‘rights’. That all part of life in a society. Rights are defined for the excellent of that society and must be observed by each member thereof. But as the
wants of the society exchange, so do “rights’. Therefore, when you speak of the ‘aptly to choose’, keep in mind that “aptly” is nothing more than what the
contemporary law says it is. And that can exchange for the excellent of the society.
Today, many women have adopted a “let the women who want kids, have them” philosophy Of way they, much like your son, do want to continue to live at home
(in our society) availing themselves of the family’s (society’s) commodities and air force and safeguard but they just don’t want to meet their own obligation, to
wit: having the family we need to carry on.
Well, it doesn’t work that way. This is a really uncharitable position and it absolutely ignores the absolute wants of society and if they don’t care, they
cannot be allowable to continue surrounded by the society they are destroying. That would be societal suicide. .
Does this sound like your son?
In November of 2007, an adult European female took it upon herself to proclaim to the planet that she had undergone sterilization to struggle overpopulation.
“Having family,” she confirmed with grave pomposity, “is selfish”.
The woman, if she is a Caucasian which I suspect she is, couldn’t be more ill-treat.
In that part of the planet everywhere overpopulation is to be sure a problem, they won’t pay the slightest attention to her. In that part of the planet that will pay
attention,. the problem isn’t too many babies, it’s too few.
If this woman is Caucasian, rather than sterilization, she would have been better served by getting pregnant.
Today’s birth rate for Caucasian woman in most of the Western planet is way below the sustaining rate of 2.1 per healthy adult woman. Therefore, they are
successfully terminating their entire race. With 5,000 being women like this one, will have hurt it.
Even as this is right of Caucasian women, it is not so right of additional women. For example, the birth rate in Muslim countries is way over 3.0 per woman; hence,
Muslim populations are expanding and will not expire. It’s the same with African and South American Hispanics (mix of White, Black and Indian), these
populace groups also have sustainable birth rates and therefore are not in danger of imminent extinction. Today, only Caucasians are in danger of
extinction, with one foremost exception: Japan: Japan too is flaw. Its birth rate is so low; they no longer have the family they need to care for their
elderly so they are in fact turning to robots to take care of the aged. How sad is that? Because of what this woman, and others like her, has done, Muslims
are tender into formerly Caucasian countries all over Western Europe. They are exercising more and more power and on the rise stronger even as the indigenous
white populations are at a snail’s pace aging and becoming weaker. It’s just a matter of time until the Caucasians are replaced as the power in Western Europe and I
don’t presume it will be a peaceful transition.
The fact is this may eventually be converted into a living hell for those who are charitable up power. Islam is an fanatical religious conviction when it comes to Infidels and all
those white broadcast who are left will be seen as Christian Infidels.
There will come a time when they will curse the women who so proudly carried those “CHOICE” banners.
So, I estimate the only inquiry now is, will the planet be better or of poorer quality off for this woman’s choice to end the Caucasian race – a race that has contributed
so much to the enhancement of broadcast and human rights?
Well, that depends on your top of view. (And maybe on your affect.)
Looking around, it seems clear to me that most of the non-Caucasian planet has less of the things that we Caucasians admire: less personal prosperity, less
personal freedom, less of the excellent things in life. Some may not like examination that but look around and see everywhere you want to go if you house your homeland in
America or in Western Europe or Australia or Canada. Everywhere do you want to go to live? In truth, you won’t find many seats like our homeland.
But it doesn’t matter any more. The stout is in the fire and western broadcast is on the way out thankfulness to the women who have austerely been too busy doing
vital things to have babies.
It is too late to turn the demographic clock back now. We might be able to slow it up a modest but we can no longer reverse it.
We have reached the top of no-restore.
Caucasian women with their ‘aptly to choose’ will have ‘brilliant’ to converted those 43 formerly Western European Caucasian nations (birthplace to so many of
our ancestors) to Muslim nations I don’t know to the horror of the few remaining Christians. This upcoming populace exchange has been confirmed by the UN Crucial top
on Populace Hegemony and by the US Census Bureau and is well underway already.
Alas, our Caucasian women have made one too many terrible choices. They came to believe that what they were doing out in the planet was more vital than having
babies when in truth, nothing else a woman – any healthy woman – does, is one tenth as vital as having babies. We can exist without her production in the
workforce, we cannot exist without her babies in life.
Now some of you undoubtedly don’t like examination this but unfortunately it’s still right. And because it’s right, it has to be said. The choice not to have
babies has condemned some of our broadcast to a very sad ending to their life. The pity is that it won’t happen to those who caused it. It will happen to their
family and grandchildren. They will be ones that have to pay the fee for “a woman’s aptly to choose”. .
This is not a political blog. It is not a religious blog. It is not a sexist blog. And it is NOT a racist blog.
This is a demographic blog – a blog about worldwide populace data as complied by the UN and the US Census Bureau. The despondent truth is, there are
penalty to actions and this blog is about those penalty.
How vital these penalty may be, is up to you to choose. If you don’t reckon it matters, then fine, it doesn’t matter. But how you feel about it won’t
really matter anyway because what is vacant to be, is vacant to be – with your consent or without it.
Caucasian women worldwide now have a birth rate ranging from a catastrophic 1.1 (Spain, Germany and Italy) to a self-destructive 1.5 (America) with a
worldwide mean of 1.5, facts which promise the end of their race. These women have brilliant extinction for the rest of us. They are unreliable the very
planet we live in. Here are some examples from around the planet:
EUROPE: The populations of Canada and Western Europe – largely Caucasian – are in honest decline. So terrible is it that, according to the intelligence of the US
Census Bureau and of Johns Hopkins University, they have already passed the top of no restore.
Each of these countries must now find new populations to replace the contemporary Caucasian populations that are disappearing because of a lack of sufficient
substitution babies. In Europe, the answer is now clear: Muslims.
Muslim populations in Western Europe are mushrooming and in 20-30 being, Caucasian will be aminority there just as they are in the United States.
CANADA: Canada’s problem is not as perilous as Europe’s (Muslim extremism) but much of poorer quality than the problem in the United States. Disparate the United States
everywhere the decreasing white race is life peacefully replaced by Mexican Christians, Canada has no such void asset. The races and cultures in the planet that
are producing surplus populations are far removed from Canada’s borders both in miles and ideologies. There is also the matter of climate to deliberate. Canada
is cold even as the Middle East and Africa with burgeoning populations, are both warm. Community populations there might not find the colder climate of Canada
appealing. So everywhere can Canada look to find its new Canadians before their Caucasian populace dies out? It’s a excellent inquiry and I wish I had a excellent
answer. But I don’t.
Canada’s prospect – or lack thereof – is sealed. It is destined to restore to its ex- state, that of a pure wasteland.
UNITED STATES; In the United States things are not as terrible. Even with the fact that that the birth rate of Caucasian woman has fallen to 1.5 births per adult
female (25% fleeting of a sustaining rate), as I have pointed out the influx of Mexican women with a much higher birth rate is making up for the shortfall.
Averaging the decrease birthrate of Caucasians with the higher birth rate of these immigrants gives America an by and large birth rate of 2.0 which is sufficient to
sustain the populace level about everywhere it is. The caveat is that the racial mix of America is undergoing radical exchange and in the near prospect, the flaw
Caucasian race will be replaced by Mexican Spanish (Whites) and South American Hispanics (diverse Indian, Spanish, and Black).
Subsequent is an official list of European countries that have surprisingly announced improved birth rates in 2007. Wait until you see who is kidding whom:
1) France 2) Netherlands 3) Belgium 4) Switzerland 5) Austria 6) Germany 7) Italy and
Spain
That was a surprise until we checked into the European countries that have the peak proportion of Muslims in their populations. They are:
1) France 2) Netherlands 3) Belgium 4) Switzerland 5) Austria 6) Germany 7) Italy and
Spain
Notice anything? Of way you do.
The two lists are like peas in a pod.
The boost in populace they are so proud of all came from the Muslims that have went into their countries; their indigenous Caucasian populations are
still flaw out.
Has anyone noticed the riots around London and Paris and in The Netherlands recently? Who was rioting? It was reported that “youths” were rioting in France.
Youths? No, it wasn’t “youths”, it was Muslims. How is that doable when in France, only 10% of the populace are reported to be Muslim? Simple. The riots
took house around urban areas like Paris and that’s everywhere the Muslims live. In those areas, the Muslims are 30% of the broadcast and they are young and male
compared to the community populations which are much grown-up and have more females. It’s not even close to a honest struggle.
The prospect for France (like much of Europe) is alas clear: Too few babies = too few adults /=/ takeover. Spain, Germany and Italy and maybe even England
aren’t far in the rear France. In 2006, they all reported very low Caucasian birth rates averaging around 1.25 per woman. England abstractedly higher, but others
abstractedly decrease.
November, 2006 New York Times:
“Disparate (additional) dips in populace progression throughout history, this slide, which started in the ‘60s, was not caused by a natural or fiscal catastrophe or war or
a plague. There’s no Black Fatality to hold responsible, no Planet War I, no Splendid Depression. This decline is rife; it is steady, and the contemporary decline shows no
cryptogram of reversing as before ones have.” End Excerpt.
The United Nations Populace Division’s Biannual Compendium on Planet Populace Prospects:
“In an undersized country, the mean woman must have 2.2 babies in her lifetime in order to keep up a stable populace. In a urban state it is
2.1
July 16, 2006 – Tokyo, Japan
TOKYO — Japan has embarked on a path no urban state has ever followed — of sustained and unalterable populace decline.
SPAIN: Spain faces massive decline in populace
RUSSIA: Russia is facing a demographic pickle so dire that its populace may maybe shrink by half surrounded by 40 being.
MEXICO: Surprisingly, even Mexico’s populace is commencement to decline. Terrible habits catch on promptly
____________________________________________
Okay, so what do we do to save ourselves from extinction – because that is exactly what we are discussion about – extinction brought about by women who reckon
working in an personnel or a pile or whatever is more vital than having the babies upon which our prospect depends. Well, I don’t reckon anything will reverse
today’s reality, but here are some thoughts life talked about:
(1) Restore fatherliness to the house it once held. Elevate fatherliness and pay women for raising family just as we pay for any additional benefit.
(2) Encourage women to have babies in those seats everywhere babies are in fleeting give.
(3) Reward families (financially) that have the babies that society wants to carry on. Any that or encourage – and finance – mass migration from countries
with too many babies to countries with too few babies. That would work but it would also exchange perpetually the demographics of the host nations from the ancient
Caucasian base to the new Muslim/African base. The time of this transition might also be the time of huge pain and distress for those life dispossessed.
Those are some of the thoughts life discussed but alas, there is no one solution to all the problems since one half the planet has too many and the additional has
too few babies.
Irrevocably, I have heard women contend that this type exchange is normal. That if the white Caucasians expire, there will be others to replace them so why would
it matter? It’s just a exchange and if it happens, so be it.
Well, to some extent, that may be right. But the white Caucasian race has been on this planet for over 5,000 being and it has been responsible for many of the
best things that have happened to humanity. I wouldn’t refer to its demise as just a “exchange”. Not at all. In some seats it’s vacant to be catastrophic. This
kind of exchange always is.
I pity the family who must grow up to face this demoralizing challenge.
Yet, there is nothing to be done about it now. I therefore write this only to inform those who were so sure they were aptly that they were devastatingly
ill-treat. Many continue to be, to this day.
We have atrophied our heritage owing to our selfishness and stupidity. And now, we have to deal with it.
I house you with this plotting:
There are none as blind as those that will not see.
Have a nice day.
JOEY
Articles in Joey’s Talk and Controversy are the prompt opinions of Joey and not Boomeryearbook. But, even as non-members can read articles on
boomeryearbook.com only members can make observations. Joey’s part is called Joey’s Talk and Controversy for a excellent reason. In Joey’s terms, “I hope I’ve
agreed you food for plotting and you will join boomeryearbook and answer”.
www.boomeryearbook.com is a shared networking site connecting the Baby Boomer generation. Impart your view, rediscover ancient friends, or enlarge your mind
with brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join today to learn the many ways we are choice Boomers connect for fun and profit.
For www.boomeryearbook.com
Online expert on innumerable topics
Correlated Womens Issues Articles












